The 500 Million-Year-Old Hormone

Does It Shatter Darwin's Legacy?

Article Navigation
Introduction The Relaxin Enigma Resurrection Biology Darwin's Dilemma Scientist's Toolkit Conclusion

Compelling Introduction

For decades, a molecular detective story has unfolded in laboratories worldwide, centered on an unassuming hormone called relaxin. This tiny protein – found in creatures from sharks to humans – became the centerpiece of a radical claim: that its patterns of evolution defy Charles Darwin's concept of a universal "Tree of Life." When biochemist Christian Schwabe discovered near-identical versions of relaxin in species as evolutionarily distant as pigs and whales, he ignited a scientific firestorm. Could a 500 million-year-old hormone really dismantle one of biology's foundational theories? The answer reveals far more about evolution's breathtaking complexity than Darwin could have imagined – and why his framework remains standing amid revolutionary science 1 4 .

The Relaxin Enigma: A Molecular Challenge to Darwin's Tree

Christian Schwabe's investigations into relaxin (a hormone critical in reproduction) uncovered baffling patterns:

  • Unexpected Similarities: Whale relaxin showed near-identical structure to pig relaxin (differing by only 1-2 amino acids), yet bore only 55% similarity to relaxin from closer relatives like primates or rodents 1 .
  • Evolutionary Mismatches: Insulin (a closely related hormone) phylogenetically grouped pigs closer to humans than humans are to chimpanzees – contradicting established evolutionary relationships 1 .
  • The "Polyphyletic" Challenge: Schwabe argued these patterns couldn't be explained by descent from a single common ancestor (monophyly), suggesting instead multiple independent origins of life (polyphyly). His "Genetic Potential Hypothesis" proposed life arose from pre-existing genetic templates scattered throughout the universe 1 4 .
Table 1: The Relaxin Paradox - Unexpected Similarities Across Species
Species Pair Evolutionary Distance Relaxin Similarity Expected Similarity
Pig vs. Whale Very Distant (~90 MYA*) 98-99% <70%
Human vs. Chimpanzee Very Close (~6 MYA) ~99% >98%
Rat vs. Guinea Pig Relatively Close ~55% >85%
Shark vs. All Mammals Extremely Distant ~55% <50%

*MYA = Million Years Ago. Data compiled from Schwabe (1994) and Wilkinson et al. (2005) 1 4 .

Schwabe's work, published in peer-reviewed journals like the FASEB Journal and Trends in Biochemical Sciences, was initially met with strong resistance. Critics like John Timmer dismissed it as "borderline deranged." However, the core observation – relaxin's perplexing distribution – was undeniable. As researchers noted, "relaxin evolution has confounded researchers for decades... startling similarities have been observed between very distant species such as pigs and whales" 1 4 .

Resurrection Biology: Rewinding the Tape of Hormonal Evolution

To resolve controversies like the relaxin puzzle, scientists needed a time machine. Joe Thornton's lab at the University of Chicago pioneered a revolutionary technique: ancestral protein resurrection.

The Experiment: Rewinding 500 Million Years
1. Molecular Phylogenetics

Researchers compiled hundreds of gene sequences for steroid hormone receptors (a protein family crucial for responding to hormones like estrogen and testosterone) from modern species 5 .

2. Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction

Powerful computational models analyzed these sequences to infer the most likely DNA code of the ancestral receptor genes existing before and after two critical whole-genome duplication events ~500 million years ago during the Cambrian explosion 5 7 .

3. Gene Synthesis & Biochemical Testing

The lab chemically synthesized the inferred ancient DNA sequences, inserted them into cells, and produced the ancient proteins. They then tested which modern hormones (estrogen, testosterone, cortisol, etc.) these resurrected receptors could detect and respond to 5 .

The Revelations:

  • The very ancient receptor (predating the genome duplications) responded only to estrogens 5 .
  • Crucially, introducing just two specific mutations into the ancient estrogen receptor's gene sequence caused a dramatic 70,000-fold shift in its preference. It now responded strongly to other steroid hormones (like testosterone and cortisol) instead of estrogen 5 .
  • These mutations occurred naturally during the genome duplications. This "molecular tinkering" provided the raw material (extra gene copies) and mechanism (key mutations) for entirely new hormonal communication systems to evolve explosively during the Cambrian period 5 7 .
Table 2: Thornton's Key Ancestral Protein Resurrection Results
Resurrected Protein Age (Est. MYA) Response to Estrogen Response to Testosterone/Cortisol Key Mutations Required
Ancestral ER (Pre-Duplication) ~600 Strong None None
Ancestral ER (Post-1st Duplication) ~525 Moderate Weak 1-2 minor
Ancestral Corticoid Receptor (Post-2nd Dup.) ~500 None Strong 2 Critical Mutations

Data derived from Thornton et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2013) 5 .

Why This Matters for Relaxin (and Darwin):

Thornton's work demonstrated how chance genetic events (duplications, mutations), filtered by natural selection, can produce radically new molecular functions rapidly. Relaxin's seemingly erratic evolutionary pattern likely reflects similar processes:

  1. Gene/Genome Duplication: Creates spare copies of the ancestral relaxin/insulin-like gene.
  2. Mutation & Diversification: Spare copies mutate, leading to new hormones (relaxin-1, 2, 3; INSL3, 4, 5, 6) with distinct functions 4 .
  3. Convergent Evolution & Selective Pressure: Unrelated species facing similar physiological challenges (e.g., pregnancy in mammals requiring pelvic ligament relaxation) might independently evolve similar solutions (like similar relaxin structures) because they start from similar genetic templates and face similar selective pressures. This is convergence, not evidence for separate origins of life 1 4 .
Gene Duplication

Creates extra copies of genes that can evolve new functions without disrupting the original gene's role.

Convergent Evolution

Unrelated species develop similar traits independently due to similar environmental pressures.

Darwin's Dilemma and the Cambrian "Big Bang" Revisited

The Cambrian explosion (530 million years ago) saw the abrupt appearance of most major animal body plans in the fossil record within a relatively short window – a phenomenon that deeply troubled Darwin, who expected gradual change. He lamented the lack of Precambrian fossils in Origin of Species: "The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained" 2 6 .

Cambrian Timeline

The Cambrian explosion occurred over a relatively short geological timespan, showing rapid diversification of life forms.

How Modern Science Addresses the Dilemma:

  1. Precambrian Life Confirmed: Decades of fossil hunting have uncovered a rich, albeit often subtle, Precambrian record of life, including complex single-celled organisms and the enigmatic Ediacaran fauna, predating the Cambrian explosion 2 .
  2. Genomic Potential Unleashed: Thornton's work and studies on whole-genome duplications provide the molecular mechanism for rapid change. The duplication events provided vast amounts of new genetic raw material. Mutations in these duplicated genes (like those affecting hormone receptors or hormones like relaxin) could then enable dramatic new adaptations without necessarily disrupting core functions 5 7 .
  3. Environmental Triggers: Geological evidence (like the "Great Unconformity") suggests massive tectonic shifts and glaciation occurred before the Cambrian. These events could have caused significant environmental changes (e.g., rising oxygen levels) that acted as a selective pressure, accelerating the evolution of complex traits in organisms already primed for change by their genomic duplications 2 7 .

The "500 million-year-old hormone" doesn't disprove Darwin; it showcases the potent interplay of his core mechanism – natural selection acting on variation – with chance genomic events (duplications) and environmental upheaval, enabling evolutionary leaps.

As Thornton stated, "Changes in just two letters of the genetic code... set in motion the evolution of our present-day hormonal and reproductive systems" 5 .

The Scientist's Toolkit: Decoding Molecular Evolution

Key research reagents and techniques power discoveries like these:

Table 3: Essential Toolkit for Hormone Evolution Research
Reagent/Technique Function/Description Role in Relaxin/Darwin Debate
Phylogenetic Software Analyzes DNA/protein sequences to reconstruct evolutionary trees & ancestral sequences. Identifies anomalous patterns (like relaxin similarities) & infers ancient genes.
Gene Synthesis Chemically constructs DNA sequences in the lab. "Resurrects" inferred ancient genes for testing (Thornton's method).
Recombinant Protein Expression Inserts synthetic genes into cells (bacteria, yeast) to produce the protein they encode. Produces ancient or modified hormones/receptors for functional tests.
Ligand Binding Assays Measures how tightly hormones bind to their receptors. Tested resurrected receptors' responses to modern hormones.
Mass Spectrometry Precisely determines the chemical structure of molecules. Confirmed near-identical relaxin structures in pigs & whales.
Genome Databases Collections of sequenced genomes from diverse species. Enabled Wilkinson's analysis of relaxin family evolution across vertebrates 4 .

Conclusion: Darwin Upgraded, Not Disproven

Christian Schwabe's relaxin provided a crucial challenge, highlighting real complexities in molecular evolution that Darwin couldn't have foreseen. However, rather than overthrowing Darwinian evolution, modern science has revealed its richer, more intricate mechanisms:

Tree of Life or Thicket?

While universal common ancestry (LUCA) remains strongly supported, the evolutionary "tree" has many horizontal connections (gene transfer, especially in microbes) and complex branchings. Relaxin's pattern reflects divergent and convergent evolution within this tree, not evidence for separate origins 1 4 .

Evolution's Leaps

Whole-genome duplications and key mutations provide the "jump-start" mechanism enabling rapid diversification, resolving the paradox of the Cambrian explosion's speed without violating natural selection 5 7 .

Darwin's Enduring Core

Variation (mutations, duplications), inheritance, and natural selection remain the powerful engine driving evolutionary change. The "500 million-year-old hormone" demonstrates this engine's capacity to generate both stunning conservation (ancient relaxin function) and radical innovation (new hormones/receptors) from the same fundamental process 1 5 .

As Gert Korthof, a critical observer of evolutionary biology, emphasizes, science thrives on challenges to prevailing views 3 . The relaxin controversy ultimately strengthened evolutionary theory, showcasing its ability to incorporate complex molecular data.

Darwin's brilliance lay not in having all the answers, but in providing the framework – adaptable and upgradeable – through which we unravel life's astonishing history. The hormone's 500-million-year journey doesn't break the tree; it reveals the dynamic, interwoven branches of life's enduring saga.

References